USPTO serial 77681105
PROFORMANCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PROFORMANCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Eric J. Hanson
Eric J. Hanson Hunton & Williams LLP600 Peachtree Street, N.E.Bank of America Plaza, Suite 4100Atlanta, GA 30308Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemical preparations for cleaning purposes in the food and food processing industries | ACTIVE | — |
| 003 | All purpose cleaning preparations; preparations for cleaning, protecting and preserving vehicle surfaces; carpet cleaning preparations; glass cleaning preparations; preparations for cleaning condenser coils of air filters for air conditioning, heating and air filtration units; cleaning preparations for removing graffiti; floor finishing preparations; floor stripping preparations; floor cleaning preparations; drain openers; degreasing preparations not used in manufacturing processes for institutional and commercial use; dishwashing detergents; clean-in-place (CIP) cleaning preparations for use in restaurants, food handling and food processing operations | ACTIVE | — |
| 004 | All purpose lubricants; all purpose penetrating oil | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Herbicides, insecticides, pesticides and fungicides for commercial or industrial use; insect repellents; all purpose disinfectants; disinfectant toilet bowl cleaners; sanitizing preparations for commercial, institutional and industrial use; clean-in-place (CIP) sanitizing preparations for use in restaurants, food handling and food processing operations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Zep IP Holding LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 004
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named PROFORMANCE
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 28, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 28, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 4, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 4, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |