USPTO serial 77681534
ANNE WEINTRAUB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3948313Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 19, 2011
- Examiner
- BEN, LINDSEY HEATHER
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ANNE WEINTRAUB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
G. Matthew Brockway
G. MATTHEW BROCKWAY ICARD, MERRILL, CULLIS, TIMM, ET ALSUITE 6002033 MAIN STSARASOTA, FL 34237-6093Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Providing information in the field of real estate via the Internet | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 19, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 24, 2017 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 19, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 12, 2011 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2011 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 11, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 9, 2011 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 16, 2011 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 14, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2011 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Dec 30, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 27, 2010 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Dec 27, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 27, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 25, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 22, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 23, 2010 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jun 23, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 23, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 26, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 22, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 22, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 30, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 10, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 27, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 27, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 27, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 26, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 22, 2009 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 22, 2009 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 22, 2009 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 21, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |