USPTO serial 77681758
4 WAYS TO DRINK MORE WATER AT WORK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHANOSKI, JOANNA MARIE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with 4 WAYS TO DRINK MORE WATER AT WORK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Elizabeth Horton
ELIZABETH HORTON AMERICAN SPECIALTY HEALTH INCORPORATED777 FRONT STSAN DIEGO, CA 92101-6002UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Providing a web site featuring information on exercise and fitness; Arranging and conducting incentive award programs to encourage the frequent, continued and effective practice of physical exercise; Arranging and conducting incentive award programs to encourage the frequent, continued and effective practice of healthy living behaviors | ABANDONED | Jul 10, 2009 |
| 044 | Providing a web site featuring information on health and nutrition; Providing wellness services, namely, personal assessments, personalized routines, and maintenance schedules; Health care services, namely, wellness programs | ACTIVE | Jul 10, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 2019 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Nov 20, 2019 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Nov 20, 2019 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Sep 11, 2019 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 3, 2019 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| May 3, 2019 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2019 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 6, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 2, 2011 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Dec 2, 2011 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2010 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 7, 2010 | IURF | IU INFORMAL RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | IUFF | USE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 20, 2009 | IUAL | UNTIMELY AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 20, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 27, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |