Drawing for THE MORE YOU DRINK, THE BETTER YOU THINK

USPTO serial 77682315

THE MORE YOU DRINK, THE BETTER YOU THINK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
โ€”
Examiner
CORWIN, CHARLOTTE K
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE MORE YOU DRINK, THE BETTER YOU THINK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert Berliner

ROBERT BERLINER BERLINER & ASSOCIATES555 W 5TH STFL 31LOS ANGELES, CA 90013-1018

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Powdered nutritionally fortified beverage mixACTIVEโ€”

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited ยง2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 11, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 11, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 19, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILEDโ€”
Jul 19, 2012NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILEDโ€”
Jul 18, 2012EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTEDโ€”
Jul 18, 2012ICNANOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CORRECTION ENTEREDโ€”
Jun 26, 2012EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILEDโ€”
Jun 26, 2012EPPATEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVEDโ€”
Jun 26, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 14, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILEDโ€”
Jan 13, 2012EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTEDโ€”
Jan 2, 2012EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILEDโ€”
Jan 2, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 30, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINERโ€”
Jun 25, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILEDโ€”
Jun 24, 2011EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTEDโ€”
Jun 23, 2011EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILEDโ€”
Jun 23, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 14, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILEDโ€”
Dec 13, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTEDโ€”
Dec 13, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGALโ€”
Nov 24, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILEDโ€”
Nov 24, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 9, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILEDโ€”
Jul 7, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTEDโ€”
Jul 7, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILEDโ€”
Jul 7, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 12, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline โ€” usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 20, 2009NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILEDโ€”
Oct 20, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 11, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETEDโ€”
Sep 11, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIEโ€”
Sep 4, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTERโ€”
Sep 4, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTEREDโ€”
Sep 4, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILEDโ€”
Sep 4, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILEDโ€”
Sep 4, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTENโ€”
May 26, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 26, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 26, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 22, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINERโ€”
Mar 6, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTEREDโ€”
Mar 6, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTEREDโ€”

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance