USPTO serial 77682804
BLACK CARD REPORT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HUGHITT, ELIZABETH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BLACK CARD REPORT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan J. Barricella
SUSAN J. BARRICELLA RUTAN & TUCKER, LLP611 ANTON BLVD STE 1400COSTA MESA, CA 92626-1931UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Printed periodical, namely, a business and lifestyle magazine featuring articles and information in the fields of travel, fashion, jewelry, culture, art, literature, leisure, shopping, entertainment, health, beauty, fine dining, wine, culinary arts, cigars, automobiles, yachts and boats, consumer electronics, home and interior design, real estate, finances, society and celebrity | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Providing an on-line publication in the nature of a business and lifestyle magazine featuring articles and information in the fields of travel, fashion, jewelry, culture, art, literature, leisure, shopping, entertainment, health, beauty, fine dining, wine, culinary arts, cigars, automobiles, yachts and boats, consumer electronics, home and interior design, real estate, finances, society and celebrity | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 16, 2012 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Feb 16, 2012 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2012 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 29, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 29, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 29, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 29, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 23, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 7, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 7, 2009 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |