USPTO serial 77682809
Serial No. 77682809
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VOHRA, SANJEEV KUMAR
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 77682809?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Woodbridge, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Amy E. Carroll
AMY E. CARROLL DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP1500 K ST NWSTE 1100WASHINGTON, DC 20005-1209Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Pocket knives | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Sunglasses; ski goggles; calculators; stick-shaped USB memory drives | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Aircraft and parts and fittings therefor | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Passport holders; notebooks; paper napkins | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | Tote bags, sports bags, beach bags, garment bags for travel, luggage and luggage tags; leather key chains; umbrellas | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Coffee cups; empty plastic water bottles; wine openers | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | Blanket throws; beach towels; table linens, namely, napkins | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Men's, women's and children's clothing, namely, T-shirts, shirts, sweaters, leather jackets, fleece jackets and wind-resistant jackets; baseball, basketball and hockey jerseys; ski jackets; golf shirts; headwear, namely, hats and visors, skullcaps, ski hats, baseball hats; scarves | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Toy airplanes; puzzles; playing cards; golf bags | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | Nut-based snack foods; shelled nuts; roasted nuts; seasoned nuts; potato crisps and potato chips | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Candy; chewing gum; puffed corn snacks; salad dressing; vinegar; sugar; corn chips | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Aircraft business management services, namely, managing and arranging aircraft operations and aircraft crew scheduling for others | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Offering aircraft fractional ownership programs to others | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | Aircraft chartering services; flight planning services for others; and fractional aircraft services for passengers, namely, furnishing jet air transportation for passengers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NetJets Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 2, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 30, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 30, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 30, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 8, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 23, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 23, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2009 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |