USPTO serial 77682874
LIGHT - WHERE YOU NEED IT, WHEN YOU NEED IT!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DEFORD, JEFFREY S
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LIGHT - WHERE YOU NEED IT, WHEN YOU NEED IT!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Matthew D. Stein
MATTHEW D. STEIN PIERCE ATWOOD LLP1 MONUMENT SQPORTLAND, ME 04101-4033UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Street, roadway, highway, parking lot, and outdoor lighting fixtures using light-emitting diodes (LEDs), and software, controls and switches therefor | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 1, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 29, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 4, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 14, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 24, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 4, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 25, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |