USPTO serial 77682914
ULTRAPOWER MATÉ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMPSON, HEATHER
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ULTRAPOWER MATÉ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer L. Whitelaw
JENNIFER L. WHITELAW WHITELAW LEGAL GROUP3838 TAMIAMI TRL N STE 310NAPLES, FL 34103-3586UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Goods manufactured from or including maté, namely, herbal food beverages; beverages, namely, grain-based beverages and grain-based food beverages; processed herbs; organic foods, namely, chocolate, dairy-free chocolate, reduced fat chocolate, reduced calorie chocolate, cocoa, chocolate chips, chocolate fondue, chocolate toppings, reduced fat candy, bakery products, namely, cakes and pies, crackers, biscuits, ready-to-eat cereal-derived food bars, pretzels, chewing gum, frozen yogurt, frozen custard, fruit ices, pancake and waffle mixes, salad dressing, pasta and pasta mixes, rice, cornmeal and wheat-based snack foods; food beverages, namely, chocolate food beverages not being dairy-based or vegetable based, and grain-based food beverages; functional foods, namely, chocolate, dairy-free chocolate, reduced fat chocolate, reduced calorie chocolate, cocoa, chocolate chips, chocolate fondue, chocolate toppings, reduced fat candy, bakery products, namely, cakes and pies, crackers, biscuits, ready-to-eat cereal-derived food bars, pretzels, chewing gum, frozen yogurt, frozen custard, fruit ices, pancake and waffle mixes, salad dressing, pasta and pasta mixes, rice, cornmeal and wheat based snack foods; breakfast cereals; functional beverages, namely, grain based food beverages containing oats or oat extracts, herbal food beverages; food flavorings; and wheat bran-based snacks and snack foods, rice bran-based snacks and snack foods; processed wheat and rice bran | ABANDONED | — |
| 032 | Goods manufactured from or including maté, namely, organic beverages, namely, fruit drinks, fruit-flavored beverages, vegetable-flavored beverages, soft drinks, drinking water, fruit juices and vegetable juices; functional beverages, namely, fruit drinks, fruit-flavored beverages, vegetable-flavored beverages, soft drinks, drinking water and fruit juices and vegetable juices | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 2010 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 20, 2010 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 20, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 20, 2010 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 31, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 31, 2009 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 4, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 15, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 31, 2009 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| May 18, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 15, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 15, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 13, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 29, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |