Drawing for HEARTBREAK RECOVERY KITCHEN

USPTO serial 77683324

HEARTBREAK RECOVERY KITCHEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEIPZIG, MARC J
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HEARTBREAK RECOVERY KITCHEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sandra Epp Ryan

SANDRA EPP RYAN FAEGRE & BENSON LLP90 S 7TH ST STE 2200MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-3901UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Printed materials, namely, books featuring information in the fields of food, cooking, recipes, restaurants, entertaining, travel, interior design and decorating, the culinary arts, relationships and self-improvementACTIVE—
041Entertainment services, namely, an ongoing television program featuring food, cooking, recipes, restaurants, entertaining, travel, interior design and decorating, the culinary arts, relationships and self-improvement; production and distribution of television programs featuring food, cooking, recipes, restaurants, entertaining, travel, interior design and decorating, the culinary arts, relationships and self-improvementACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 19, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 19, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 18, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 16, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 16, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 16, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 16, 2010NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 21, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 21, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 18, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 18, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 2, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 2, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 2, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 2, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 2, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 18, 2010GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 18, 2010GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 18, 2010CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jun 25, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 25, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 25, 2010ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Dec 28, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 28, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 28, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 1, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 1, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 1, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 1, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 1, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 1, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 27, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 9, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 7, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance