USPTO serial 77683528
MOOV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4388326Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 20, 2013
- Examiner
- GOLD, BARBARA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MOOV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Alasko Frozen Foods, Inc./Aliments Congeles Alasko Inc.
Montreal, CA
Other trademarks owned by Alasko Frozen Foods, Inc./Aliments Congeles Alasko Inc.
MONTREAL, QUEBEC, CA
MONTREAL, QUEBEC, CA
MONTREAL, QUEBEC, CA
ALASKO FOODS INC./ALIMENTS ALASKO INC.
MONTRÉAL, QUÉBEC, US
Other trademarks owned by ALASKO FOODS INC./ALIMENTS ALASKO INC.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark B. Harrison
MARK B. HARRISON VENABLE LLPPO BOX 34385WASHINGTON, DC 20048UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Frozen fruit confections | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 21, 2011 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Alasko Frozen Foods, Inc./Aliments Congeles Alasko Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by MOOV FROZEN FOODS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by MOOV FROZEN FOODS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by MOOV FROZEN FOODS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ALASKO FOODS INC./ALIMENTS ALASKO INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named MOOV
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2022 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 19, 2022 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 27, 2020 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 25, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 20, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 18, 2013 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2013 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 9, 2013 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 26, 2013 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 20, 2013 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 1, 2013 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 6, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 17, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 3, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 20, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 13, 2012 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 10, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 10, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2012 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 27, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 5, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 12, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 2, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 27, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 15, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 26, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 12, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 29, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 2, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2010 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 31, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 24, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 7, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 1, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |