Drawing for CLEAR SPRINGS

USPTO serial 77684589

CLEAR SPRINGS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LOTT, MAUREEN DALL
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CLEAR SPRINGS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ruth J. Lebed-Rofes

RUTH J. LEBED-ROFES S. C. JOHNSON & SON, INC.1525 HOWE STRACINE, WI 53403-2237UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003disposable wipes impregnated with cleaning chemicals or compounds for household useABANDONED—
005all purpose household disinfectants with cleaning, deodorizing, and germicidal propertiesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 17, 2011MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Aug 17, 2011ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Aug 16, 2011EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Mar 16, 2011NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Mar 15, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 12, 2011EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 12, 2011DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 9, 2011EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 9, 2011DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Mar 9, 2011ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Mar 9, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 2, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 1, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 1, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 10, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 10, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 30, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 5, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 5, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 1, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 30, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 12, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 12, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 12, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 12, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 18, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 11, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 9, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 9, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance