Drawing for REVOLUTIONIZING INNOVATION

USPTO serial 77684778

REVOLUTIONIZING INNOVATION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HESIK, APRIL ANNE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with REVOLUTIONIZING INNOVATION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William F. Ahmann

WILLIAM F. AHMANN PERKINS COIE, LLP101 JEFFERSON DRMENLO PARK, CA 94025-1114UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software that provides real-time, integrated business management intelligence by combining information from various databases and presenting it in an easy-to-understand user interface to enable the integrated management of marketing, corporate strategy, and the full-lifecycle of innovation effortsACTIVE—
035Business management consulting in the field of innovationACTIVE—
041Education services, namely, providing conferences, workshops and meetings in the field of outcome driven innovationACTIVE—
042Hosted information services, namely, hosting computer software applications of others to enable the integrated management of marketing, corporate strategy, and the full-lifecycle of innovation efforts; implementation services, namely, implementation of computer software to enable the integrated management of marketing, corporate strategy, and the full-lifecycle of innovation efforts; application service provider, namely, providing hosted computer software applications of others and hosted information services of others, namely, hosting web sites and data of others to enable the integrated management of marketing, corporate strategy, and the full-lifecycle of innovation effortsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 4, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 4, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 2, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 8, 2009NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 8, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 5, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 5, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 21, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 13, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 13, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 13, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 13, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 7, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 7, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 7, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 28, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 28, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 28, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 27, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 9, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 9, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance