Drawing for ULTRA FRESH

USPTO serial 77685505

ULTRA FRESH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JACKSON, STEVEN W
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ULTRA FRESH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kenneth P. George, Esq.

HOLLY PEKOWSKY, ESQ. AMSTER, ROTHSTEIN & EBENSTEIN LLP90 PARK AVENUENEW YORK, NY 10016-1301UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005SANITARY NAPKINS AND PANTILINERSACTIVENov 1, 1996

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 12, 2010MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 10, 2010ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 10, 2010EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 25, 2010EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jun 7, 2010EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 7, 2010EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 8, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 8, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 8, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 30, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 30, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 30, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 30, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 30, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 30, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 29, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 10, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 10, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance