Drawing for EARTH SMART OFFICE

USPTO serial 77685693

EARTH SMART OFFICE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HELFMAN, JUDITH MICHELLE
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EARTH SMART OFFICE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John G. Tutunjian

John G. Tutunjian Tutunjian & Bitetto, P.C.425 Broadhollow RoadSuite 302Melville, NY 11747

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Disposable wipes impregnated with disinfecting chemicals or compounds therefor for use in business and home offices, warehouse facilities and production and manufacturing facilities; Disposable wipes impregnated with disinfecting chemicals or compounds therefor for use on office desks, telephone handsets and headsets, light switch tabs, cell phones, computer keyboards, countertops, hand controls for production machinery, cafeteria tables, water fountain buttons and handles, sinks, toilets, door knobs; Sanitizing wipesACTIVE—
009Arm rests for use with computers; Computer stands specially designed for holding a computer, printer and accessories; Digital photo frames for displaying digital pictures, video clips and music; Wrist rests for computer mouse users; Wrist rests for use with computersACTIVE—
021Garbage cans; Trash cansACTIVE—
027Chair mats; Floor matsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 31, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 31, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 2, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 2, 2011NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Apr 1, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 1, 2011DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 31, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 28, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 28, 2011DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Mar 28, 2011ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Mar 28, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 17, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 28, 2010NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 3, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 3, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 29, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 29, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 16, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 16, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 16, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 16, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 16, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 10, 2010GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 10, 2010GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 10, 2010CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 25, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 25, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 25, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 20, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 20, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 2, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 2, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 2, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 28, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 11, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 10, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance