USPTO serial 77687375
LIGHTSOUT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMAS, JANICE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LIGHTSOUT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Vaughan, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard S. Wesorick
JAMES R MENKER HOLLEY & MENKER PAPO BOX 331937ATLANTIC BEACH, FL 32233UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | CONSULTING IN THE FIELD OF ENERGY EFFICIENCY; BUSINESS SERVICES, NAMELY, FACILITIES MANAGEMENT OF TECHNICAL OPERATIONS; CONDUCTING ENERGY AUDITS FOR THE PURPOSE OF DETERMINING ENERGY EFFICIENCY TO SAVE MONEY ON ENERGY COSTS | ABANDONED | — |
| 040 | CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF MANUFACTURING | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE, COST CONTROL AND AUTOMATION FOR MANUFACTURING FACILITIES; CONDUCTING ENERGY AUDITS FOR THE PURPOSE OF ASSESSING ENERGY USE TO MAKE IT MORE EFFECTIVE | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2015 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 21, 2015 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 21, 2015 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 21, 2015 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 23, 2015 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2015 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2015 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 16, 2014 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 5, 2014 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 17, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 10, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 24, 2014 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 25, 2014 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 19, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 18, 2013 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 16, 2013 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 8, 2013 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 2, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 27, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 24, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 15, 2012 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 13, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 12, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 11, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 17, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 3, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 1, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 16, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 3, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 18, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 18, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 20, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 4, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |