USPTO serial 77687468
DECKLIGHTING KIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3884491Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 30, 2010
- Examiner
- CHHINA, KARANENDRA S
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DECKLIGHTING KIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey R. Ramberg
JEFFREY R. RAMBERG LAW OFFICE OF JEFFREY R. RAMBERG18 OLD MANOR RDNEWARK, DE 19711-8013UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Low and line voltage electric lighting products, namely, light bulbs and lamps, lighting fixtures and housings, mounting hardware, and associated parts therefor | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 31, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 7, 2017 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Oct 28, 2010 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 27, 2010 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 27, 2010 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 7, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 2010 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 6, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 6, 2010 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 27, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2010 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 13, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 11, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 29, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 29, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 4, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 18, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 18, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |