USPTO serial 77687530
NU-LIFE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MEYERS, MORGAN LAURA
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NU-LIFE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
West Palm Beach, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leslie A. Burgk
Leslie A. Burgk Leslie A. Burgk, P.A.900 East Ocean Blvd, Suite D-130Stuart, FL 34994UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Amino acids for nutritional purposes; Calcium supplements; Dietary and nutritional supplements; Dietary beverage supplements for human consumption in liquid and dry mix form for therapeutic purposes; Dietary food supplements; Dietary supplemental drinks; Dietary supplements; Dietary supplements for controlling cholesterol; Dietary supplements for human consumption; Food supplements; Herbal supplements; Homeopathic supplements; Liquid nutritional supplement; Meal replacement and dietary supplement drink mixes; Mineral food supplements; Mineral nutritional supplements; Mineral supplements; Natural herbal supplements; Nutraceuticals for use as a dietary supplement; Nutritional drink mix for use as a meal replacement; Nutritional drinks used for meal replacement; Nutritional energy bars for use as a meal substitute; Nutritional shakes for use as a meal substitute; Nutritional supplement in the nature of a nutrient-dense, protein-based drink mix; Nutritional supplements; Powdered fruit-flavored dietary supplement drink mix; Powdered nutritional supplement drink mix; Protein supplements; Soy protein for use as a nutritional supplement in various powdered and ready-to-drink beverages; Vitamin and mineral supplements; Vitamin supplement in tablet form for use in making an effervescent beverage when added to water; Vitamin supplements | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2007 |
| 041 | Providing newsletters in the field of health, nutrition and distribution via e-mail; Providing on-line newsletters in the field of health, nutrition and distribution | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2007 |
| 044 | Counseling services in the fields of health, nutrition and lifestyle wellness; Dietary and nutritional guidance; Food nutrition consultation; Nutrition counseling; Nutritional therapy services; Providing a web site featuring information on health and nutrition; Providing a web site that features information on children's nutrition; Providing an on-line computer database featuring information regarding health and nutrition; Providing information about dietary supplements and nutrition | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 20, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 17, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 17, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 4, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 4, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 4, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |