Drawing for BRANT'S SNAPS

USPTO serial 77689381

BRANT'S SNAPS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SOMERVILLE, ARETHA CHARESE
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BRANT'S SNAPS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven W. Webb

Steven W. Webb Law Offices of Steven W. Webb825 College Blvd. Suite 102-620Oceanside, CA 92057UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Unmounted and mounted photographsACTIVE—
035On-line retail store services featuring mounted and unmounted photographsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 9, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 9, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 10, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 10, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 28, 2010CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Jan 19, 2010APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Dec 24, 2009ICNANOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CORRECTION ENTERED—
Dec 10, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 3, 2009EPPATEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Oct 6, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 14, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 24, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 5, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 5, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 3, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 3, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 16, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 16, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance