CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for I-PORT

USPTO serial 77689623

I-PORT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EINSTEIN, MATTHEW T
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with I-PORT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Deborah A. Peacock

HILARY A NOSKIN PEACOCK MYERS PC201 3RD ST NWALBUQUERQUE, NM 87102UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software, not associated with a mercantile exchange, for analyzing and characterizing the market in futures, equities and currencies tradingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 9, 2010MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 8, 2010ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 7, 2010EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 19, 2010EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jul 13, 2010GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Jul 13, 2010GNSFSUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Jul 13, 2010CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN—
Jun 22, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 22, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 22, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 23, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 23, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 23, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 12, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 12, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 12, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 2, 2010ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Apr 2, 2010EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 2, 2010JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 2, 2010EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 2, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Oct 2, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 2, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 12, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 11, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 11, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 5, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 5, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 5, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 3, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 17, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 16, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance