USPTO serial 77689842
IOLITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 27, 2011
- Examiner
- CAPSHAW, DANIEL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with IOLITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LEIGH ANN LINDQUIST. Other Appointed attorney's are Jody H. Drake, Kevin G. Smith, Gabrielle S. Roth and Stephanie K. Wade.
LEIGH ANN LINDQUIST SUGHRUE MION, PLLC2000 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE NW, SUITE 9000WASHINGTON, DC, 20006UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Gas powered handheld vaporizers for vaporizing vaporizable constituents of herbal and plant matter for creating an aroma [ ; electrically powered handheld vaporizers for vaporizing vaporizable constituents of herbal and plant matter for creating an aroma ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | [ Vaporizers for perfume sold empty; handheld vaporizers for perfume sold empty; vaporizers for vaporizing aromatic essences and aromatic concentrates in liquid, solid, flake, particulate and powder forms; vaporizers for vaporizing essential oils, perfumes, herbal and plant matter all for creating aroma; perfume burners; essential oil burners; vapor generators for generating vapor from propylene glycol for creating an aroma; and replacement parts for all the aforesaid vaporizers, namely, replacement mouthpieces, replacement chambers for vaporizable materials and replacement filters ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 034 | Gas powered vaporizers for producing an inhaleable aerosol; [ electrically powered vaporizers for producing an inhaleable aerosol; ] handheld gas powered vaporizers for producing an inhaleable aerosol; [ handheld electrically powered vaporizers for producing an inhaleable aerosol; ] gas powered vaporizers for vaporizing vaporizable constituents of herbal and plant matter for producing an inhaleable aerosol; [ electrically powered vaporizers for vaporizing vaporizable constituents of herbal and plant matter for producing an inhaleable aerosol; ] handheld gas powered vaporizers for vaporizing vaporizable constituents of herbal and plant matter for producing an inhaleable aerosol; [ handheld electrically powered vaporizers for vaporizing vaporizable constituents of herbal and plant matter for producing an inhaleable aerosol; ] handheld gas powered vaporizers for vaporizing vaporizable constituents of herbal and plant matter contained in cigar or cigarette form for producing an inhaleable aerosol; [ handheld electrically powered vaporizers for vaporizing vaporizable constituents of herbal and plant matter contained in cigar or cigarette form for producing an inhaleable aerosol; ] gas powered vaporizers for vaporizing vaporizable constituents of herbal and plant matter in liquid, solid, flake, particulate and powder forms for producing an inhaleable aerosol; [ electrically powered vaporizers for vaporizing vaporizable constituents of herbal and plant matter in liquid, solid, flake, particulate and powder forms for producing an inhaleable aerosol; ] handheld gas powered vaporizers for vaporizing vaporizable constituents of tobacco for producing an inhaleable aerosol; [ handheld electrically powered vaporizers for vaporizing vaporizable constituents of tobacco for producing an inhaleable aerosol; handheld gas powered vaporizers for vaporizing vaporizable constituents of tobacco contained in cigar or cigarette form for producing an inhaleable aerosol; handheld electrically powered vaporizers for vaporizing vaporizable constituents of tobacco contained in cigar or cigarette form for producing an inhaleable aerosol; parts for vaporizers used for producing an inhaleable aerosol, namely, pouches for herbal and plant matter for use in vaporizers; parts for vaporizers used for producing an inhaleable aerosol, namely, pouches partly or wholly of permeable membrane material for herbal and plant matter for insertion in vaporizers; parts for vaporizers used for producing an inhaleable aerosol, namely, pouches for tobacco for use in vaporizers; parts for vaporizers used for producing an inhaleable aerosol, namely, pouches partly or wholly of permeable membrane material for tobacco for insertion in vaporizers; ] and replacement parts for all the aforesaid vaporizers, namely, replacement mouthpieces, replacement chambers for vaporizable materials and replacement filters | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Oglesby & Butler Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Oglesby & Butler Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Oglesby & Butler Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 034
- Similar marks named IOLITE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 2022 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2022 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED | — |
| Feb 18, 2022 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Feb 18, 2022 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Feb 16, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 15, 2021 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2021 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2020 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2017 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2017 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 13, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 31, 2017 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 12, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 7, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 3, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 3, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 3, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 20, 2011 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 9, 2011 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Apr 25, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 19, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 1, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 1, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2011 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2011 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2011 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 15, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 12, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2010 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 16, 2010 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jul 8, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 8, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 8, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 18, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 17, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 16, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 10, 2010 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 27, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 26, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 8, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 26, 2009 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |