Drawing for GIVE OUT LOUD

USPTO serial 77689970

GIVE OUT LOUD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUTLER, MIDGE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GIVE OUT LOUD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Patrick C. Woolley

Patrick C. Woolley Polsinelli Shughart PC700 W. 47th Street, Suite 1000Kansas City, MO 64112UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009magnetically encoded gift cards, paper gift card holders, plastic gift card holders, foam gift card holders, cardboard gift card holders, musical gift card holders, paper holders specially adapted for holding gift cards, plastic holders specially adapted for holding gift cards, foam holders specially adapted for holding gift cards, cardboard holders specially adapted for holding gift cardsACTIVE—
016gift cards, paper gift card holders, plastic gift card holders, foam gift card holders, cardboard gift card holders, musical gift card holders, paper holders specially adapted for holding gift cards, plastic holders specially adapted for holding gift cards, foam holders specially adapted for holding gift cards, cardboard holders specially adapted for holding gift cards, gift packaging, namely, gift wrapping paper, gift card packaging made of paper, plastic gift bags, paper gift tags, plastic gift tags, foam gift tags, cardboard gift tags, wrapping paper, plastic gift wrap, paper gift wrapping ribbons, envelopes, cardboard packaging, packaging containers of paper, paper pouches for packaging, plastic bags for packaging, plastic or paper bags for merchandise packaging, fabric gift bags, merchandise bags, paper bags, paper gift bags, paper gift bags for wine, textile gift bags for wine, paper party bags, stickers, stickers and transfers, desk baskets for desk accessories, boxes of paper or cardboard, fiberboard boxes, gift boxes, paperboard boxes, paperboard, treated paper for wrapping flowers and floral displays, floral packaging, namely, paper or plastic for wrapping flowers, musical greeting cards, cardboard hang tags, paper hang tags, paper identification tagsACTIVE—
018bags with handles for carrying or holding wine or distilled spiritsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 16, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 16, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 28, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 27, 2013EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Nov 10, 2013EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Nov 10, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 15, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 14, 2013EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
May 8, 2013EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
May 8, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 15, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 15, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 14, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 13, 2012EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 9, 2012EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 9, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 9, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 6, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 5, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 1, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 10, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 10, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 12, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 10, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 10, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 10, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 26, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 10, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 15, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 15, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 7, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 1, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 31, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 31, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 21, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 21, 2010CEPECOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED—
Jul 21, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 21, 2010GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Jul 21, 2010GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Jul 21, 2010CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Jan 25, 2010GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 25, 2010GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 25, 2010CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 21, 2010ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 11, 2010PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Dec 29, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 29, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 10, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 10, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 10, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 10, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 10, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 9, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 8, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 8, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 8, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 8, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 8, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 3, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 16, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 16, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance