USPTO serial 77691425
MAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAM, HAI-LY HUYNH
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen J. Jeffries
STEPHEN J. JEFFRIES HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP2099 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NW STE 100WASHINGTON, DC 20006-6801UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Preserved, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; edible oil and fats; chocolate products, namely, chocolate milk and dairy based chocolate food beverages; snack foods, namely, potato-based snack foods, soy-based snack foods, vegetable-based snack foods, fruit-based snack foods, processed nuts, fruit chips, potato chips, soy chips, vegetable chips, and snack mix consisting primarily of processed fruits, processed nuts and/or raisins; snack food dips, namely, bean dips, dairy-based dips, fruit-based dips and vegetable-based dips, excluding salsa and other sauces used as dips | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Flour; preparations made from cereals, namely, processed cereals and ready to eat, cereal derived food bars; confectionary products, namely, bread, cookies, cakes, biscuits, wafer biscuits, creamed-filled biscuits, chocolate coated wafers, cream coated wafers, wafer rolls and candy; chocolate products, namely, chocolate bars, chocolate candies, chocolate chips, chocolate covered nuts, chocolate fondue, chocolate mousse, chocolate pastes, chocolate spreads, chocolate powder, chocolate syrup, chocolate topping, chocolate truffles, chocolate based fillings for cakes and pies, filled chocolate, hot chocolate and milk chocolate; breakfast cereals; corn flakes; snack foods, namely, cereal-based snack foods, rice-based snack foods, corn chips, flour-based chips, flour-based chips with shrimp flavour, grain-based chips, pita chips, tortilla chips, crackers, pretzels, frozen confections, salsa, sauces used as dips, and snack mix consisting primarily of crackers, pretzels, candied nuts and/or popped popcorn | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Oriental Food Industries Sdn. Bhd.
- Other trademarks owned by Oriental Food Industries Sdn. Bhd.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named MAX
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 7, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 3, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 8, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 19, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 2, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 2, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 21, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 30, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 7, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |