Drawing for QUICKCLEAN BASE

USPTO serial 77692524

QUICKCLEAN BASE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PATE, TARA J
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with QUICKCLEAN BASE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Russell W. Warnock

JAMES E. HOWARD BSH HOME APPLIANCES CORPORATION100 BOSCH BLVDNEW BERN, NC 28562-6924UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Household and kitchen machines and equipment, namely, domestic cooking ovens, electric and gas ranges, electric and gas cooktops, and structural parts therefor for heating, steaming, cooking, baking, frying, grilling, toasting, thawing, and keeping hotACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 14, 2010MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 9, 2010EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 17, 2010ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 17, 2010EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Sep 17, 2010EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jun 7, 2010GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jun 7, 2010GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jun 7, 2010CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
May 5, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 5, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 5, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 16, 2010ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Apr 16, 2010EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 16, 2010JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 16, 2010EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 31, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Oct 31, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 31, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 18, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 18, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 18, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 16, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 12, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 12, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 12, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 8, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 21, 2009MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Mar 20, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 20, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance