USPTO serial 77693021
KENNETH BEER MD SCIENTIFIC SKINCARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 29, 2010
- Examiner
- FRAZIER, TAMARA G
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with KENNETH BEER MD SCIENTIFIC SKINCARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
West Palm Beach, FL
West Palm Beach, FL
West Palm Beach, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Catherine McGivney
Catherine McGivney CONNELLY ROBERTS & MCGIVNEY LLC55 W MONROE ST STE 1700CHICAGO, IL 60603-5125UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Personal care products, namely, body lotions, soaps, non-medicated bath salts, skin moisturizers, hair and skin neutralizers for cleansing, facial and body cleansers, exfoliators and scrubs, skin cleaners, eye, body and skin creams, anti-aging and anti-wrinkle cleansers, gels, toners, creams, beauty serums, lotions and foams, non-medicated acne treatment cleansers, gels, toners, creams, lotions and foams, cosmetic pads, skin care cosmetic pads, non-medicated anti-itch foams and non-medicated foams for skin rashes, non-medicated skin brighteners and lighteners, body washes, body and bath oils, sun screen and makeup | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 13, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 2017 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 12, 2012 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - POWER OF ATTORNEY NOT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2012 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 15, 2010 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Jun 29, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 13, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 6, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 4, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 10, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 10, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 10, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 10, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 1, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 10, 2009 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 8, 2009 | GEAN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2009 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2009 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 8, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 2009 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |