Drawing for PRICESMART

USPTO serial 77693903

PRICESMART

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MUNN LEWIS, LAKEISHA S
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with PRICESMART?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Peter D. Vogl, Esq.

Peter D. Vogl Jones Day222 East 41st StreetNew York, NY 10017-6727UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Financial services, namely, valuation of securities for institutional investorsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 28, 2010MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
May 28, 2010ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
May 28, 2010OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
May 28, 2010OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Jan 13, 2010OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Oct 15, 2009ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Sep 15, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 26, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 10, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 10, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 1, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 16, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 15, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 15, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 9, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 9, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 9, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 9, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 24, 2009MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Mar 23, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 21, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance