Drawing for PROFOUNDCUTS

USPTO serial 77694134

PROFOUNDCUTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BEN, LINDSEY HEATHER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PROFOUNDCUTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Elyse A. Marcus

Elyse A. Marcus DAY PITNEY LLP7 Times SquareNew York, NY 10036-7311UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Hair care preparationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 14, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 14, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 22, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 22, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 18, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 26, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 6, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 22, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 22, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 22, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 22, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 22, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 22, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 22, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 22, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 24, 2009MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Mar 23, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 21, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance