Drawing for DYNAMIC UPRIGHT MRI

USPTO serial 77694523

DYNAMIC UPRIGHT MRI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
KUNG, KAELIE ELIZABETH
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DYNAMIC UPRIGHT MRI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert B. Cohen

ROBERT B. COHEN LERNER, DAVID, LITTENBERG, KRUMHOLZ & MENTLIK, LLP600 SOUTH AVE W STE 2WESTFIELD, NJ 07090-1497UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING APPARATUS FOR MEDICAL USE, AND INSTRUCTION MANUALS SOLD AS A UNITACTIVE
044RADIOLOGY SERVICESACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 8, 2010MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT
Jul 8, 2010ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Jul 8, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 2, 2010LOAPLETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED
Jul 2, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 14, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 23, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Dec 23, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 23, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 7, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 7, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 7, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 12, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 12, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 12, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 10, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 23, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Mar 23, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance