Drawing for OREO FUN STIX

USPTO serial 77694738

OREO FUN STIX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SINGLETON, RUDY
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OREO FUN STIX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Matthew A. Griffin

MATTHEW A. GRIFFIN SENIOR COUNSEL-TRADEMARKS3 LAKES DRNORTHFIELD, IL 60093-2753UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030WafersACTIVEMar 16, 2009

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 21, 2010MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 11, 2010ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 11, 2010EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 26, 2010EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jun 12, 2010GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jun 12, 2010GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jun 12, 2010CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jun 4, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 4, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 4, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 23, 2010ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 23, 2010EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 23, 2010JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 23, 2010EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 24, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Nov 24, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 24, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 3, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 2, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 2, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 2, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 2, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 2, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 20, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 24, 2009MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Mar 23, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 23, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance