Drawing for DANCER FLEET PETER HUGHES DIVING BOATIQUE

USPTO serial 77695926

DANCER FLEET PETER HUGHES DIVING BOATIQUE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ABRAMS, JACQUELINE WILLETTE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with DANCER FLEET PETER HUGHES DIVING BOATIQUE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Roy Tritt

Roy Tritt Warlick, Tritt, Stebbins, & Murray, LLP119 Davis Rd.Suite 1-FMartinez, GA 30907

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Operating an on-line shopping site in the field of scuba divingACTIVENov 1, 2008

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 16, 2010FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 26, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 19, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 18, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 12, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 12, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 12, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 10, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 14, 2009TAEATEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED—
Apr 14, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 14, 2009PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Mar 25, 2009MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Mar 24, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 24, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance