USPTO serial 77697510
ORTHOTEC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AWRICH, ELLEN
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ORTHOTEC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BOZEN, IT
72666 Neckartailfingen, DE
72666 Neckartailfingen, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Frank P. Presta
FRANK P PRESTA NIXON & VANDERHYE901 NORTH GLEBE ROAD11TH FLOORARLINGTON, VA 22203-1853UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | (Based on 44(e)) (Based on Intent to Use) SUNGLASSES, SKI GOGGLES | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | (Based on 44(e)) (Based on Intent to Use) SPORTS CLOTHING, NAMELY, ANORAKS, OVERALLS, SKI JACKETS, SKI PANTS, SKI SHIRTS AND SKI SOCKS, SHIRTS, PANTS, SPORT CAPS AND SKIING CAPS, RIDING PANTS, BRITCHES, COATS AND SOCKS, FOOTBALL, BASEBALL AND SOCCER UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, PANTS, SHIRTS, SOCKS, SHORTS, PULLOVERS, CAPS AND HATS; CYCLIST'S PANTS AND PULLOVERS, GLOVES; SKIING AND SNOWBOARDING GLOVES; RIDING GLOVES; LEISURE CLOTHING, NAMELY, SOCKS, STOCKINGS, LEISURE GLOVES, CAPS, HATS, TRAINING SUITS, SHORTS, T-SHIRTS, SWEATSHIRTS, PULLOVERS AND SLEEVELESS PULLOVERS, JERSEYS, BOXER SHORTS, KNITWEAR, NAMELY, SWEATERS, KNITTED HATS, KNITTED GLOVES, SWEAT SUITS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by REUSCH INTERNATIONAL S.P.A.
- Other trademarks owned by Reusch GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Reusch GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named ORTHOTEC
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 2019 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 14, 2019 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 31, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2019 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 28, 2019 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 11, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2018 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 7, 2018 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 14, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2018 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 12, 2018 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 27, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2018 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2018 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 26, 2018 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 21, 2017 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2017 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Oct 20, 2017 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 20, 2017 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 22, 2017 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Sep 22, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 20, 2017 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 13, 2017 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2017 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2017 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 9, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2017 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 7, 2017 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 13, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 19, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 29, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 9, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 9, 2016 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 9, 2016 | EXDM | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT | — |
| Oct 20, 2014 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 20, 2014 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 23, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 23, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 22, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 22, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 4, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 4, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 31, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 26, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 21, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 1, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 29, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 28, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 18, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 18, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 24, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 23, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 23, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 23, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 23, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 23, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 23, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 11, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 10, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 28, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 27, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |