Drawing for PROTECTED PROFILES

USPTO serial 77699446

PROTECTED PROFILES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RITTNER, HANNO I
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PROTECTED PROFILES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John R. Yates

JOHN R. YATES GREENBERG & BASS, LLP16000 VENTURA BLVD STE 1000ENCINO, CA 91436-2762UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Financial management, planning and consulting servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 15, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 15, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 15, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Apr 13, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 13, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 13, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 13, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 21, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 1, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 18, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 18, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 16, 2009CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 15, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 15, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 15, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 15, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 15, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 30, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 28, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance