Drawing for BED FOR THE HEAD

USPTO serial 77700378

BED FOR THE HEAD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WATSON, JULIE A
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with BED FOR THE HEAD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Abelman

LAWRENCE E. ABELMAN ABELMAN, FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 3RD AVE10th FloorNEW YORK, NY 10017-4011

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
024PillowsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 22, 2013MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 22, 2013ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 25, 2012GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 25, 2012GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 25, 2012CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jun 20, 2012RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Dec 14, 2011GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 14, 2011GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 14, 2011CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 14, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 14, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 13, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 13, 2011ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jun 14, 2011CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 14, 2011CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Dec 14, 2010CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 14, 2010CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 14, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 14, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 1, 2010ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Aug 12, 2010CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 12, 2010CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Feb 12, 2010CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 10, 2010CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 10, 2010ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 10, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 4, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 28, 2009CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 24, 2009CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Dec 24, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 17, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Dec 17, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 17, 2009CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 16, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 15, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 31, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 30, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance