USPTO serial 77700378
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E. Abelman
LAWRENCE E. ABELMAN ABELMAN, FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 3RD AVE10th FloorNEW YORK, NY 10017-4011| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | Pillows | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 22, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 25, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 20, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 14, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 14, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 12, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 10, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 10, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 28, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 24, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 17, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |