Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 77700785?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/77700785. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns DAKOTA VALLEY HARVEST?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 77700785, the listed owner(s) include: Steck Wholesale Foods, Inc..

What is USPTO serial number 77700785?

Serial number 77700785 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark DAKOTA VALLEY HARVEST. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

What is the current status of DAKOTA VALLEY HARVEST?

DAKOTA VALLEY HARVEST (77700785) currently shows USPTO status code 603 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Which trademark classes cover DAKOTA VALLEY HARVEST?

The public record lists International Classes: 029. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

4.9/5

USPTO serial 77700785

DAKOTA VALLEY HARVEST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603

Filing date: Mar 27, 2009
Status date: Dec 14, 2011
Registration date: —
Examiner: BUTTON, JENNIFER JO
Law office: TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DAKOTA VALLEY HARVEST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Steck Wholesale Foods, Inc.
North Sioux City, SD
Other trademarks owned by Steck Wholesale Foods, Inc.

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mollie A. Newcomb

MOLLIE A NEWCOMB BOYLE FREDRICKSON SC840 NORTH PLANKINTON AVENUEMILWAUKEE, WI 53203UNITED STATES

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
029	English Muffins and Baking Powder Biscuits to be sold to retail stores and distributors	ACTIVE	—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Feb 6, 2012	MAB3	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Feb 1, 2012	EXPT	EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED	—
Dec 14, 2011	ABN3	ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Dec 14, 2011	EXFB	EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF	—
Mar 8, 2011	GNS1	NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED	—
Mar 8, 2011	GNSF	SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED	—
Mar 8, 2011	CFRC	SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	—
Feb 15, 2011	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Feb 14, 2011	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Feb 14, 2011	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 12, 2010	GNRN	NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 12, 2010	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 12, 2010	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 14, 2010	GNS1	NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED	—
Jul 14, 2010	GNSF	SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED	—
Jul 14, 2010	CFRC	SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	—
Jul 7, 2010	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Jul 7, 2010	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jul 7, 2010	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
Jun 17, 2010	ERFR	TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED	—
Jun 17, 2010	ERFR	TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED	—
Jun 17, 2010	EXPI	EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED	—
Jun 17, 2010	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
Jun 17, 2010	EXAF	EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB	—
Dec 17, 2009	GNFN	NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED	—
Dec 17, 2009	GNFR	FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 17, 2009	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 25, 2009	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Nov 24, 2009	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Nov 24, 2009	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 18, 2009	ARAA	ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 18, 2009	REAP	TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED	—
Jun 19, 2009	GNRN	NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 19, 2009	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 19, 2009	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 17, 2009	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Apr 1, 2009	MDSC	NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED	—
Mar 31, 2009	NWOS	NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED	—