Drawing for PBB

USPTO serial 77701060

PBB

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEASER, ANDREW C
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PBB?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen P. McNamara

Stephen P. McNamara St. Onge Steward Johnston & Reens LLC986 Bedford StreetStamford, CT 06905-5619UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Software management system, namely, computer software for data privacy allowing users to enter, submit, and store their personal data in online applications, and to prevent unauthorized collection and use of such personal dataACTIVE—
042Digital data services, namely, software as a service (SAAS) services and application service provider services featuring computer software for data privacy allowing users to enter, submit, and store their personal data in online applications, and to prevent unauthorized collection and use of such personal dataACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 24, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 24, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 21, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 20, 2012EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Nov 19, 2012EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Nov 19, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 24, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 23, 2012EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Apr 26, 2012EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Apr 26, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 30, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 29, 2011EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 23, 2011EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 23, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 26, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 25, 2011EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 25, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 23, 2011EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 23, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 12, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 10, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 10, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 10, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 25, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 2, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 2, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 28, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 28, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 6, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 16, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 16, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 16, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 16, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 3, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 2, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 2, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 2, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 2, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 2, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 8, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 8, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 8, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 1, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 31, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 31, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance