USPTO serial 77701427
Serial No. 77701427
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3938421Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 29, 2011
- Examiner
- BRECKENFELD, WILLIAM G
- Law office
- —
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with Serial No. 77701427?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Grenoble, FR
Grenoble, FR
Grenoble, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William R. Samuels
William R. Samuels Warshaw Burstein, LLP575 Lexington Avenue7th FloorNew York, NY 10022Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | [Distributed and compact electronic devices for measuring, interpreting, recording parameters and data, namely, of movement, of displacement and of orientation of a human body, adapted, in particular, to the capturing of kinematics and dynamics, of physical or physiological human motor activity; portable devices, namely, for the purpose of bio-mechanical analysis of human movement, namely, portable electronic sensors and integrated electronic sensors; electronic devices for analyzing and monitoring human movements with a view to their quantification or performance; ]apparatus for recording, transmission, processing or reproduction data, measuring, sound, images comprising gesture interaction data to examine and measure internal and external forces acting on the human body and the effects produced by these forces; electronic motion detectors of events linked to movement; computer and game console peripherals, particularly for the interaction of movement with multimedia content; gesture-controlled electronic devices, namely, mice and remote controls for human motion measurement;[ electronic measuring calculator of geometric shapes; clothing for use in laboratories equipped with electronic measuring, and movement analysis devices; electronic bracelets or necklaces to measure human body movement; software, namely, software to monitor human body movements and to process the measure of information relative to movement; software for database creation, management, update and use; ]software installed in portable devices, namely, mobile phones or personal electronic assistants, or electronic navigation devices for measuring, analyzing and reporting movement[; software to enable access to an electronic messaging service; software to enable access to an information technology and data transmission network, namely, a global communication network or a private or reserved network; data transmission software of all kinds via a fixed transmission network; diagnostic apparatus for testing human body movement not for medical use] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 30, 2008 |
| 010 | [Surgical, medical apparatus and instruments and apparatus for biomechanical analysis of human movement; apparatus for medical use, namely, apparatuses for physiological measurement, namely, of human movement enabling assistance with medical diagnosis, health risk prevention, physical re-education; goniometric measuring apparatus, namely, to evaluate stretched joints; electronic devices to measure human movement for apparatus used to work physical mobility; electronic devices to measure movement for human motor function re-education; electronic patches to measure human movement adapted in particular to the analysis of movement, to the measuring of diurnal or nocturnal activity, to the detection of a fall, to the analysis of the physical condition for sport] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 30, 2008 |
| 042 | [Technical feasibility studies, research and development in the field of measuring and analysis of biometric movement apparatus; technical feasibility studies, research and development in the field of software for the monitoring of human movement; engineering services, namely, evaluations, estimations and research performed in the scientific and technological fields; design and development of computers and software; research and development of new products; engineering services, particularly technical project planning and design engineering of movement measuring machines; electronic computer systems architecture services; software development, installation, maintenance, and update; computer programming; data conversion of computer programs, not physical conversion] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 30, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 12, 2021 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 2, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 2, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 21, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2020 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 26, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2017 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2017 | 8.PR | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 5, 2017 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 30, 2017 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Aug 29, 2017 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 2017 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Mar 30, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 6, 2017 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2015 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Mar 12, 2015 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 25, 2011 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2011 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 17, 2011 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 25, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2011 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 24, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 24, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 23, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 23, 2010 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 29, 2010 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 4, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 27, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 27, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 12, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 12, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 12, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 2, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 2, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 23, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 23, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |