Drawing for THE DNA SYMPHONY

USPTO serial 77701436

THE DNA SYMPHONY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRADLEY, EVELYN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE DNA SYMPHONY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Tyler Hubley

David Chen DWC Law Firm, P.S.PO Box 3041Seattle, WA 98114UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Books in the field of the creation and use of music for healing, controlling stress, and preventing cellular damageACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 19, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 19, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 27, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 26, 2012EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Apr 19, 2012EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Apr 19, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 28, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 27, 2011EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 20, 2011EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 20, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 16, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 15, 2011EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 11, 2011EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 11, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 11, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 11, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 11, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 10, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 10, 2010RFTPREMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS—
Dec 7, 2010IROARESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED—
Dec 7, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 8, 2010INCEITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST—
Nov 8, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 25, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 20, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 10, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 8, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 8, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 8, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 20, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 28, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 8, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 25, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 25, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 20, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 16, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 31, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 31, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance