Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 77701963?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/77701963. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns ANTI-RIDE/RAFFERMISSANT/ECLAT?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 77701963, the listed owner(s) include: Shiseido Company, Ltd..

What is USPTO serial number 77701963?

Serial number 77701963 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark ANTI-RIDE/RAFFERMISSANT/ECLAT. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

What is the current status of ANTI-RIDE/RAFFERMISSANT/ECLAT?

ANTI-RIDE/RAFFERMISSANT/ECLAT (77701963) currently shows USPTO status code 601 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Which trademark classes cover ANTI-RIDE/RAFFERMISSANT/ECLAT?

The public record lists International Classes: 003. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

4.9/5

USPTO serial 77701963

ANTI-RIDE/RAFFERMISSANT/ECLAT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601

Filing date: Mar 30, 2009
Status date: Apr 6, 2010
Registration date: —
Examiner: CARLSEN, EMILY K
Law office: TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ANTI-RIDE/RAFFERMISSANT/ECLAT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Shiseido Company, Ltd.
Tokyo, JP
Other trademarks owned by Shiseido Company, Ltd.

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Howard N. Aronson, Esq.

Howard N. Aronson, Esq. Lackenbach Siegel LLPOne Chase RoadLackenbach Siegel BuildingScarsdale, NY 10583

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
003	beauty essences, namely, beauty serums	ACTIVE	—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Apr 6, 2010	MAB1	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT	—
Apr 6, 2010	ABN1	ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED	—
Apr 5, 2010	EXAR	TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED	—
Mar 25, 2010	ARAA	ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 25, 2010	REAP	TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED	—
Nov 7, 2009	GNRN	NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 7, 2009	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 7, 2009	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 16, 2009	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Oct 15, 2009	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Oct 15, 2009	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 24, 2009	GNRN	NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 24, 2009	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 24, 2009	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 18, 2009	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Apr 2, 2009	NWOS	NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED	—
Apr 2, 2009	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—