Drawing for THE COMPLETE MOBILE RETAILING SOLUTION.

USPTO serial 77702586

THE COMPLETE MOBILE RETAILING SOLUTION.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
THOMPSON, HEATHER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE COMPLETE MOBILE RETAILING SOLUTION.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

N. Christopher Norton, Esq.

N. Christopher Norton, Esq. Arent Fox LLP1050 Connecticut Ave., NWWashington, DC 20036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Providing an online retail store featuring a wide variety of consumer goods and services of others; advertising and marketing, namely, promoting the goods and services of others; dissemination of advertising for others via an on-line communications network on the internet; marketing or advertising or promoting the retail goods and services of others to wireless or non-wireless communication devices; business services for consumers or others consisting of business data collection or reportingACTIVE—
038Telecommunication consultation services relating to telecommunications computer software used to facilitate interfaces between computer software or computer hardware used in wireless communication devices or computers or used within mixed networks employing wireless or non-wireless communication devices or computersACTIVE—
039Services for consumers or others consisting of electronic storage of dataACTIVE—
042Consultation, evaluation and research in the fields of computer software development or the use of computer software applications or data, hosting computer software applications for others and social networking; telecommunication computer software technology consultation services relating to computer software used to facilitate interfaces between computer software or computer hardware used in wireless communication devices or computers, or within mixed networks employing wireless or non-wireless communication devices or computersACTIVE—
045Services for consumers or others consisting of digital rights management, namely, authentication, issuance or validation of digital certificatesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 13, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 13, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 22, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 22, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 11, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 16, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 16, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 13, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 13, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 24, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 18, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 17, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 17, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 18, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 18, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 18, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 17, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 2, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 2, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance