USPTO serial 77703885
NEXTGEN ANALYTICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FICKES, JERI J
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NEXTGEN ANALYTICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James C. Wray
JAMES C. WRAY JAMES C. WRAY1493 CHAIN BRIDGE RD STE 300MC LEAN, VA 22101-5726UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business consultation services, namely, consultation in the fields of staff augmentation and increasing effectiveness of staff with computer software application development and project outsources, in the fields of communications, information technology and electronic business, providing information technology and solutions, consulting, business management, and program and value management, architecture and solutions delivery, business solutions, technology solutions, analytics and enterprise content management, managing and harnessing information in structured and unstructured data, producing market insight, managing risk, targeted infrastructure platform solutions for network, storage and security, ensuring regulatory compliance, managing data content and optimizing business processes for improving productivity, streamlining operations and enhancing regulatory compliance, achieving and maintaining competitive advantages, providing secure stable platform for storing, processing and protecting corporate data and assets, providing qualified consultants and teams for extending organizational abilities and capacity, providing ability to capture, store, access, find, integrate, manage, share and deliver business data, and optimizing business processes for smaller and faster decisions for maximizing revenue, containing costs, providing secure, accurate, scaleable, robust and rules-based document life cycle management, providing web content management for creating, approving, managing, retaining and publishing content via Internet, intranet, extranet and portals, providing management for integrating, managing and distributing video, audio, still images data and text and providing access to content and tools for editors, managers and producers, providing records management for identifying, classifying, circulating, archiving, preserving and destroying records, providing management tools for data discovery, analyzing, modeling and visualizing, providing collaboration and analytic solutions for customer service, retention and acquisition and customer driven product innovation, marketing and decision making, providing fraud detection by analyzing information in structured and unstructured data, and uncovering information in trends, patterns and relationships | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 23, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 23, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 21, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 21, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 26, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 20, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 18, 2011 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 18, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 18, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 18, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 24, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2011 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 24, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 24, 2011 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 24, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 30, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 30, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 7, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 28, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 27, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 4, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |