USPTO serial 77703897
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Retail store services in the field of fire protection systems, fire detection systems, fire alarm systems, special hazard systems, fire suppression systems, special hazard suppression systems, fire sprinkler systems, and electronic security systems for buildings, namely, access-control systems and anti-burglary systems, all for commercial or residential use; Installation of fire protection systems, fire detection systems, fire alarm systems, special hazard systems, fire suppression systems, special hazard suppression systems, fire sprinkler systems, and electronic security systems for buildings, namely, access-control systems and anti-burglary systems; Servicing of fire protection systems, fire detection systems, fire alarm systems, special hazard systems, fire suppression systems, special hazard suppression systems, fire sprinkler systems, and electronic security systems for buildings, namely, access-control systems and anti-burglary systems; Fabrication for others of fire protection systems, fire detection systems, fire alarm systems, special hazard systems, fire suppression systems, special hazard suppression systems, fire sprinkler systems, and electronic security systems for buildings, namely, access-control systems and anti-burglary systems; Training regarding fire protection systems, fire detection systems, fire alarm systems, special hazard systems, fire suppression systems, special hazard suppression systems, fire sprinkler systems, and electronic security systems for buildings, namely, access-control systems and anti-burglary systems; Design for others in the field of fire protection systems, fire detection systems, fire alarm systems, special hazard systems, fire suppression systems, special hazard suppression systems, fire sprinkler systems, and electronic security systems for buildings, namely, access-control systems and anti-burglary systems; Testing of fire protection systems, fire detection systems, fire alarm systems, special hazard systems, fire suppression systems, special hazard suppression systems, fire sprinkler systems, and electronic security systems for buildings, namely, access-control systems and anti-burglary systems; Inspection for safety purposes of fire protection systems, fire detection systems, fire alarm systems, special hazard systems, fire suppression systems, special hazard suppression systems, fire sprinkler systems, and electronic security systems for buildings, namely, access-control systems and anti-burglary systems; Monitoring of fire protection systems, fire detection systems, fire alarm systems, special hazard systems, fire suppression systems, special hazard suppression systems, fire sprinkler systems, and electronic security systems for buildings, namely, access-control systems and anti-burglary systems; Consulting regarding fire protection systems, fire detection systems, fire alarm systems, special hazard systems, fire suppression systems, special hazard suppression systems, fire sprinkler systems, and electronic security systems for buildings, namely, access-control systems and anti-burglary systems | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 29, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 25, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |