USPTO serial 77704804
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rosemary S. Tarlton
ROSEMARY S. TARLTON MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP425 MARKET ST FL 30SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-2482UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software providing information relating to eco-literacy and urban sustainability, ideas into action, sustainable planning, design and architecture | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Print publications, namely, books, brochures, pamphlets, workbooks and magazines relating to urban sustainability, ideas into action, sustainable planning, design and architecture; printed educational materials relating to eco-literacy and urban sustainability, ideas into action, sustainable planning, design and architecture | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Business consulting services relating to urban sustainability, ideas into action, urban sustainability planning, urban sustainable collaboration, and urban planning design and architecture; business advisory services in the field of urban planning design relating to urban sustainability and sustainable planning, sustainable processes, sustainable solutions and sustainable implementation; providing a website featuring information, non-downloadable videos and podcasts in the fields of sustainable business collaboration and sustainable business solutions | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Providing online forums and electronic bulletin boards for transmission of messages among computer users concerning eco-literacy and urban sustainability, ideas into action, sustainable planning, sustainable collaboration, sustainable solutions, design and architecture | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Providing online publications, namely, magazines, books, design briefs and abbreviated framework documents relating to urban sustainability, ideas into action, sustainable planning, design and architecture; educational services, namely, conducting educational programs relating to eco-literacy and urban sustainability, ideas into action, sustainable planning, design and architecture; arranging and conducting competitions in fields of eco-literacy and urban sustainability, ideas into action, sustainable planning, sustainable systems, sustainable solutions generation and implementation, design and architecture; providing websites featuring information, non-downloadable videos and podcasts featuring educational testing in the field of eco-literacy regarding nature, climate change and global warming and associated related fields including green building, planning, renewable energy, sustainable communities, conservation, and other human activities affecting carbon use and its impacts on the world and the environment | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Consulting services in the fields of urban planning design; computer services, namely, creating an on-line community for registered users to engage in social networking in the fields of eco-literacy and urban sustainability, ideas into action, sustainable planning, sustainable collaboration, sustainable solutions, design and architecture; providing a website featuring information, non-downloadable videos and podcasts featuring ideas into action regarding technological and scientific initiatives about environmentally-conscious and green innovations; providing a website featuring information, non-downloadable videos and podcasts in the fields of urban sustainability design planning, urban sustainable community planning, design and architecture | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 4, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 4, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 11, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 5, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 4, 2012 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 24, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 22, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 28, 2011 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2011 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 23, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 4, 2011 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 9, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 20, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 5, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 5, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 22, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 16, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 16, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2010 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 3, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 3, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 7, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 28, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 25, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 4, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |