USPTO serial 77708262
CELLNOVO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JACKSON, STEVEN W
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CELLNOVO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Medical and surgical devices, instruments, equipment and apparatus, namely, pumps for medical purposes, pumps for medical treatment purposes, pumps for use in delivering drugs and pharmaceuticals from containers, pumps for medical purposes including micro-pumps containing an ultra-low-power radio that enables wireless communication, pumps for medical purposes including micro-pumps containing wireless computer touchscreen technology, cartridges for holding pharmaceuticals for use with a pump; drug delivery devices, instruments, equipment and apparatus, namely, pumps for administering drugs and pharmaceuticals, pumps for medical purposes containing wireless computer touchscreen technology that controls and monitors drug and pharmaceutical dosage; drug delivery systems being pumps; devices, instruments, equipment and apparatus, namely, pumps for administering drugs; pumps for medical purposes, namely, portable pumps for administering and delivering drugs; pumps for administering and delivering drugs in measured quantities; pumps for controlling drug dosage; medical devices, instruments, equipment and apparatus that measures and monitors the health of a patient within a medical pump delivery system for drugs and pharmaceuticals; testing apparatus within a medical pump delivery system for drugs and pharmaceuticals to monitor the health of a patient; parts and fittings for the aforesaid goods | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Product research and design services in the fields of medical and surgical devices, instruments, equipment and apparatus; design and development of medical and surgical products, namely, medical and surgical products for use in administering and delivering drugs and pumps for administering and delivering drugs | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Medical services; rental of medical equipment and apparatus for medical purposes; providing medical information, consultancy and advisory services; healthcare | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CELLNOVO LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by Starbridge Systems Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named CELLNOVO
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 20, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 31, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 31, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 12, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 11, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 11, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 8, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 19, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 18, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 3, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 31, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 30, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 30, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 31, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 27, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 24, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 23, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 19, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 18, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 20, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 16, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 16, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 9, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 12, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 10, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 10, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 10, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 7, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 1, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 27, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 26, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 16, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 11, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 10, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 10, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 15, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 10, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 7, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 8, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 3, 2012 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 3, 2012 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 3, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 1, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 27, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 21, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 20, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 10, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 13, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 4, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 2, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 2, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 2, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 6, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 11, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 10, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |