USPTO serial 77709895
MY DEEPEST SYMPATHY.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EDWARDS, ALICIA COLLINS
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MY DEEPEST SYMPATHY.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Salvatore A. Sidoti
SALVATORE A. SIDOTI CURATOLO SIDOTI CO. LPA24500 CENTER RIDGE RD STE 280CLEVELAND, OH 44145-5681UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | bath products, namely, soaps, oils, perfumes | ACTIVE | — |
| 004 | candles | ACTIVE | — |
| 014 | jewelry; jewelry in the nature of crosses and crucifixes; cremation jewelry | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | greeting cards, condolence cards, remembrance cards, gift boxes, books about grief and inspiration, blank writing journals, rosaries, memory boxes of paper | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | cremation products, namely, capsules of plastic or wood for containing cremation remains or memorabilia, garden benches, picture and photograph frames, wind crimes, flag storage cases, wood plaques, plastic plaques, keepsake urns, wood funerary urns, plastic funerary urns, statues of wood, statues of plastic, memory boxes of plastic or wood, religious items, namely, crosses, crucifixes and containers of holy water | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | cremation products, namely, capsules of crystal, china, terra cotta, earthenware, glass or porcelain for containing cremation remains or memorabilia; porcelain figurines, porcelain statues, vases, dinnerware, namely, tea cups and mugs, remembrance ornaments of crystal, china, glass or porcelain, tear bottles of china, crystal, earthenware, terra cotta, glass or porcelain, china urns, crystal urns, glass urns, porcelain urns, terra cotta urns, china plaques, crystal plaques, glass plaques, porcelain plaques, terra cotta plaques, statues of china, statues of crystal, statues of glass, statues of porcelain, statues of terra cotta; wood urns, plastic urns | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | gourmet foods, namely, cookies, chocolates, tea, coffee | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Setterington Cemetery Services Ltd
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 004
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named MY DEEPEST SYMPATHY.COM
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 22, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 26, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 26, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 13, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 25, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 8, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 8, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 8, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 1, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 1, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 18, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 20, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 20, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 25, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 6, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 6, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 6, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 4, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 18, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 25, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 11, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |