Drawing for PHYTOHAIRSPA

USPTO serial 77710329

PHYTOHAIRSPA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TANNER, MICHAEL R
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PHYTOHAIRSPA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Milena S. Mishev

Milena S. Mishev McCarthy Fingar LLP11 Martine Avenue12th FloorWhite Plains, NY 10606-1934

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Architectural design, interior decoratingACTIVE—
044Beauty salons, hairdressing salonsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 24, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 24, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 2, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 2, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 8, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 7, 2012EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
May 29, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 29, 2012NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
May 29, 2012TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
May 29, 2012PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 29, 2012PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
May 24, 2012EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Dec 6, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 5, 2011EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 22, 2011EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 22, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 28, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 27, 2011EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 24, 2011EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 24, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 14, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 13, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 13, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 24, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 24, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 26, 2010CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Oct 26, 2010COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Oct 25, 2010CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Oct 25, 2010COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
May 22, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 20, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 20, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 20, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 24, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 26, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 14, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 1, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 12, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 28, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 28, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 28, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 28, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 28, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 28, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 28, 2009ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 27, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 27, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 17, 2009PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jul 9, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 9, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 30, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 30, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 29, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 29, 2009CEPECOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED—
Jun 29, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 29, 2009GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Jun 29, 2009GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Jun 29, 2009CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Jun 26, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 14, 2009MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Apr 13, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 13, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance