Drawing for INDUCTIGRAFT

USPTO serial 77710576

INDUCTIGRAFT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
EDWARDS, ALICIA COLLINS
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INDUCTIGRAFT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas F. Dunn

THOMAS F. DUNN MORSE, BARNES-BROWN, & PENDLETON, P.C.1601 TRAPELO RDWALTHAM, MA 02451-7333UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Synthetic materials, namely, synthetic bone substitutes for biomedical applications; biomedical materials, namely, synthetic bone substitutes, artificial bone implants, artificial bone grafts, artificial bone scaffolds, artificial bone coatings, artificial bone void fillersACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 7, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 7, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 10, 2010CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Mar 10, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Feb 3, 2010EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS
Nov 3, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 11, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 22, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jul 6, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jul 6, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 26, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 26, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 14, 2009MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
Apr 13, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Apr 13, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance