Drawing for SUNLIGHT POWER

USPTO serial 77710647

SUNLIGHT POWER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
PINO, BRIAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SUNLIGHT POWER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Eustace P. Isidore

EUSTACE P. ISIDORE DILLON & YUDELL LLP8911 N CAPITAL OF TEXAS HWY STE 2110AUSTIN, TX 78759-7200UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Solar thermal-based power plantsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 7, 2014UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN
Oct 20, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 20, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 18, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 21, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Jan 21, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 1, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Dec 13, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Dec 9, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 6, 2013RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Jun 6, 2013RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Dec 6, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jun 5, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Dec 5, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jun 3, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Dec 3, 2010GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Dec 3, 2010GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Dec 3, 2010CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Nov 15, 2010ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Nov 15, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 12, 2010PGRRPETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED
Nov 9, 2010APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF
Nov 1, 2010PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Nov 1, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 23, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 23, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 25, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 25, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 25, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 15, 2010ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jan 15, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 14, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 11, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 2, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 2, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 2, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 14, 2009MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED
Apr 13, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Apr 13, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance