CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for S2S

USPTO serial 77711275

S2S

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FAHRENKOPF, PAUL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with S2S?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jefferson F. Scher

Jefferson F. Scher CARR & FERRELL LLP120 CONSTITUTION DRIVEMENLO PARK, CA 94025UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009search engine software; software for searching via text, sound, speech, and musical queries; software in the fields of sound recognition, speech recognition, and music recognitionACTIVE—
042computer services, namely, providing search engines for obtaining data on a global computer network; computer services, namely, providing search engines for locating information within a web site; providing temporary use of online, non-downloadable site search engine software for locating information within a web site; providing temporary use of online, non-downloadable software for use in searching via text, sound, speech, and musical queriesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 27, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 26, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 24, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
May 23, 2011EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 23, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 20, 2011EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 20, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 26, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Nov 24, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 24, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 24, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 4, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 25, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 19, 2010ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Mar 2, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 10, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 28, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 28, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 6, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 18, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 17, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 17, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 22, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 16, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 15, 2009MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Apr 14, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 14, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance