USPTO serial 77711342
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
North Miami Beach, FL
North Miami Beach, FL
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter A. Matos (a member of the Bar of the State of Florida)
PETER A MATOS MALLOY & MALLOY PA2800 SW 3RD AVENUEMIAMI, FL 33129-2317UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic identification systems, namely, access control and monitoring computer hardware for people and merchandise, identification and tracking systems for people and merchandise comprised of information displays and interfaces, antennas, RFID tags, receivers; electronic equipment, namely, USB scopes in the nature of computer hardware | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 4, 2011 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 4, 2011 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 4, 2011 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 4, 2011 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 22, 2010 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 22, 2010 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 3, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 20, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 20, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 29, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 29, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 29, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 29, 2009 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 28, 2009 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 27, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 15, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |