Drawing for ENERGY DECISIONS PORTAL

USPTO serial 77711401

ENERGY DECISIONS PORTAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BENMAMAN, ALICE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ENERGY DECISIONS PORTAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jordan A LaVine

JORDAN A LAVINE FLASTER/GREENBERG P.C.1628 JFK BLVD FL 15PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-2130UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Newsletters in the field of energy, energy usage management, electrical power, power conservation, energy conserving technologies, and lightingACTIVE
041Education services, namely, providing seminars in the field of energy, energy usage management, electrical power, power conservation, energy conserving technologies, and lighting; Entertainment services, namely, providing podcasts in the field of energy, energy usage management, electrical power, power conservation, energy conserving technologies, and lighting; Entertainment services, namely, providing webcasts in the field of energy, energy usage management, electrical power, power conservation, energy conserving technologies, and lighting; On-line journals, namely, blogs featuring information in the field of energy, energy usage management, electrical power, power conservation, energy conserving technologies, and lighting; Providing newsletters in the field of energy, energy usage management, electrical power, power conservation, energy conserving technologies, and lighting via e-mail; Providing on-line newsletters in the field of energy, energy usage management, electrical power, power conservation, energy conserving technologies, and lighting; Providing on-line publications in the nature of magazines, newsletters, and guides in the field of energy, energy usage management, electrical power, power conservation, energy conserving technologies, and lighting; Providing on-line training seminars and webinars in the field of energy, energy usage management, electrical power, power conservation, energy conserving technologies, and lightingACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 16, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 16, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 12, 2010ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Dec 17, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Dec 17, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 17, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 20, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 19, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 19, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 19, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 14, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Apr 14, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance