USPTO serial 77711801
EVENTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RUTLAND, BARBARA A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EVENTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Wayne F. Reinke, Esq.
Wayne F. Reinke HESLIN ROTHENBERG FARLEY & MESITI P.C.5 COLUMBIA CIRCLEALBANY, NY 12203-5160UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | arranging and providing online educational seminars in the fields of technology, science, engineering, manufacturing, components, instruments, equipment, materials, information technology, motion, software, automation, design, power, fluids, electronics, testing, measurement, tools, construction, imaging, packaging, chemicals, optics, semiconductors, maintenance, and services related to the forgoing, namely, acoustics and audio technology, aerospace technology, alternative power, appliance technology, automotive technology, building and construction, chemical manufacturing, coatings and surface engineering, construction tools and equipment, data acquisition, defense and security technology, design and analysis software, display technologies, electromechanical drive systems, electrical components, electronic components, electronic product design, electronic test equipment, engineering management, environmental technology, fastening, joining and assembly, fibers and fabrics, food and beverage technology, glass and ceramics, healthcare manufacturing, HVAC, hydraulics, industrial automation, industrial MRO (maintenance, repairs and operating), industrial processing equipment, lab equipment, light and laser technology, machine tools and metal working, material handling, mechanical components, mechanical power transmission, medical equipment design, MEMS technology, metals and alloys, motion control components, motors, nano technology, networking and communications, oil and gas technology, packaging and labeling, plant and facilities engineering, plastics and resins, plastics fabrication, pneumatics, power generation and distribution, pump technology, quality control, robotics systems, scientific instruments, semiconductor fabrication, sensors and switches, shock, vibration and noise, solutions for industrial computing, supply chain management, test and measurement, valve technology, wire and cable technology, wireless technology, building and construction services, business services, calibration and testing services, contract manufacturing and fabrication, electrical and electronic contract manufacturing, engineering services, industrial automation services, industrial maintenance, material handling and packaging services, and specialized industrial services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 27, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 26, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 24, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 3, 2010 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2010 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 30, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 10, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 14, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 7, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 7, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 15, 2009 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |